Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(6):491-497; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh082
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krogstad, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hjortdahl, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krogstad, U.
Right arrow Articles by Hjortdahl, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 6 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Doctor and nurse perception of inter-professional co-operation in hospitals

Unni Krogstad1, Dag Hofoss1 and Per Hjortdahl2

1 Norwegian Health Services Research Centre, Quality Evaluations, Oslo, 2 University of Oslo, Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, Norway

Objective. To explore doctor and nurse perception of inter-professional co-operation in hospitals; discuss professional differences as reflections of cultural diversity in the perspective of quality improvement.

Design. Cross-sectional survey data from a stratified sample of 15 Norwegian hospitals, September 1998: 551 doctors and 2050 nurses at medical and surgical wards.

Measures. Doctor and nurse evaluation of their inter-professional co-operation was mapped. Logistic regression models predicting their satisfaction were compared.

Results. Doctors were significantly more often than nurses satisfied with the inter-professional co-operation of the two groups. Satisfaction with inter-professional co-operation was predicted by a number of work situation variables. Some of them contribute differently to doctor and nurse satisfaction.

Conclusions. Doctors and nurses not only evaluate their inter-professional co-operation differently, they also appear to define the concept in different ways. Hospital managers should include an understanding of this cultural diversity into the basis of their quality improvement efforts.

Keywords: doctor–nurse co-operation, hospital care quality, hospital work organization, professional cultures

Address reprint requests to U. Krogstad, Norwegian Health Services Research Centre, Quality Evaluations, Box 7004, St Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: unni.krogstad{at}nhsrc.no

Accepted for publication August 13, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
I S Sjetne, U Krogstad, S Odegard, and M E Engh
Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2009; 18(3): 236 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. Labarere, J.-L. Bosson, M.-A. Sevestre, E. Sellier, C. Richaud, and A. Legagneux
Intervention targeted at nurses to improve venous thromboprophylaxis
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 19(5): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
U Krogstad, D Hofoss, M Veenstra, P Gulbrandsen, and P Hjortdahl
Hospital quality improvement in context: a multilevel analysis of staff job evaluations
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 438 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
T Smith
Bringing different perspectives to bear on health care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2005; 14(1): 69 - 71.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.