Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2004 16(6):499-507; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weingart, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weingart, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 no. 6 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Lessons from a patient partnership intervention to prevent adverse drug events

Saul N. Weingart1,2,3, Maria Toth2, Jonathan Eneman4, Mark D. Aronson2,3, Daniel Z. Sands2,3, Amy N. Ship2,3, Roger B. Davis2,3 and Russell S. Phillips2,3

1 Center for Patient Saftey, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 2 Stoneman Center for Quality Improvement in General Medicine and Primary Care, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 3 Harvard Medical School, Boston, and 4 University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, USA

Background. Patient safety ‘best practices’ that call for patient participation to prevent adverse drug events have not been rigorously evaluated.

Objective. To consider lessons learned from a patient partnership intervention to prevent adverse drug events among medical in-patients.

Design. Prospective randomized, controlled pilot trial.

Setting. Boston teaching hospital.

Patients. Two hundred and nine adult in-patients on a general medicine unit.

Intervention. Intervention patients (n = 107) received drug safety information and their medication list; controls (n = 102) received drug safety information only.

Measurements. Adverse drug events and close-call drug errors were identified using chart review and incident reports from nurses, pharmacists, and physicians. Patients and clinicians were surveyed about the intervention.

Results. In 1053 patient-days at risk, 11 patients experienced 12 adverse drug events and 16 patients experienced 18 close calls. There was a non-significant difference between intervention patients and controls in survey responses and in the adverse drug event rate (8.4% versus 2.9%, P = 0.12) and close-call rate (7.5% versus 9.8%, P = 0.57). Eleven percent of patients were aware of drug-related mistakes during the hospitalization. Among nurse respondents, 29% indicated that at least one medication error was prevented when a patient or family member identified a problem.

Conclusion. Partnering with in-patients to prevent adverse drug events is a promising strategy but requires further study to document its efficacy.

Keywords: adverse drug event, medical error, patient participation

Address reprint requests to Saul N. Weingart, Center for Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115, USA. E-mail: saul_weingart{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Accepted for publication August 13, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
H J Murff, D J France, J Blackford, E L Grogan, C Yu, T Speroff, J W Pichert, and G B Hickson
Relationship between patient complaints and surgical complications
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 13 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.