Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mainz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartels, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mainz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartels, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16:i45-i50 (2004)
International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 16 Supplement 1 © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Nationwide continuous quality improvement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator Project

Jan Mainz, Birgitte Randrup Krog, Bodil Bjørnshave and Paul Bartels

The Danish National Indicator Project, Hoejbjerg, Denmark

Objective. In most countries there is no mandatory national system to track the quality of care delivered to the citizens. This paper describes an example of a national indicator project that aims at documenting and improving the quality of care nationwide.

Analysis. The Danish National Indicator Project was established in 2000 as a nationwide multidisciplinary quality improvement project. From 2000 to 2002, disease-specific clinical indicators and standards were developed for six diseases (stroke, hip fracture, schizophrenia, acute gastrointestinal surgery, heart failure, and lung cancer). Indicators and standards have been implemented in all clinical units and departments in Denmark treating patients with the six diseases, and participation is mandatory. All clinical units and departments receive their results every month. National and regional audit processes are organized to explain the results and to prepare implementation of improvements. All results are published in order to inform the public, and to give patients and relatives the opportunity to make informed choices.

Conclusion. The surveillance of health care quality is greatly aided by the use of relevant quantitative indicators. This paper describes how it is possible to organize nationwide monitoring using clinical indicators.

Keywords: clinical indicators, indicator monitoring, quality improvement, quality of care, standards of care

Address reprint requests to Jan Mainz, Lyseng Allé 1, DK-8270 Hoejbjerg, Denmark. E-mail: jmz{at}ag.aaa.dk

Accepted for publication December 4, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
K. D. Palnum, P. Petersen, H. T. Sorensen, A. Ingeman, J. Mainz, P. Bartels, and S. P. Johnsen
Older patients with acute stroke in Denmark: quality of care and short-term mortality. A nationwide follow-up study
Age Ageing, January 1, 2008; 37(1): 90 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
C.-R. Chien and M.-S. Lai
Trends in the pattern of care for lung cancer and their correlation with new clinical evidence: experiences in a university-affiliated medical center.
American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2006; 21(6): 408 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
R. C. Hermann, S. Mattke, D. Somekh, H. Silfverhielm, E. Goldner, G. Glover, J. Pirkis, J. Mainz, and J. A. Chan
Quality indicators for international benchmarking of mental health care
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, September 1, 2006; 18(suppl_1): 31 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. Mainz and P. D. Bartels
Nationwide quality improvement--how are we doing and what can we do?
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2006; 18(2): 79 - 80.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.