Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on January 21, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2005 17(2):123-132; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/123    most recent
mzi011v2
mzi011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fervers, B.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fervers, B.
Right arrow Articles by Philip, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 17 no. 2 © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology

Beatrice Fervers1,2, Jako S. Burgers1,3, Margaret C. Haugh1,2, Melissa Brouwers4,5, George Browman6, Francoise Cluzeau7 and Thierry Philip1,2

1 Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, SOR, Paris, France, 2 Centre Léon Berard, GRESAC UMR-CNRS 5823, Lyon, France, 3 University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Centre for Quality of Care Research, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 4 Program in Evidence-based Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 5 McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 6 Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 7 St George’s Hospital Medical School, Department of Community Health Sciences, London, UK

Objective. Clinical practice guidelines are widely used as effective tools for improving the management of patients with cancer. However, there is increasing concern about variation in guideline quality. In this study we identified predictors for high-quality guidelines in oncology.

Design. The quality scores for 32 oncology guidelines from 13 countries were determined by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument.

Main measures. The contribution to the quality score of six characteristics of guidelines and three of guideline developing organizations was then assessed using analysis of variance and stepwise linear regression analysis.

Results. Some guideline and organizational characteristics were shown to be responsible for a large part of the variations in quality scores. The availability of background information was the strongest predictor of quality with an explained variance ranging from 17% (‘Applicability’) to 67% (‘Rigour of development’). High-quality guidelines were more often produced by government-supported organizations and/or within a structured, coordinated programme. The other characteristics (publication year, type of guideline, format, level of care, and scope) were not independent predictors of quality.

Conclusions. Guidelines should provide more explicit information about the context of their development and methods used in order to improve their quality and thus encourage their use in clinical practice.

Keywords: clinical practice guidelines, international, network, oncology quality assessment

Address reprint requests to Margaret C. Haugh or Beatrice Fervers, E-mail: m.haugh{at}lyon.fnclcc.fr or fervers{at}lyon.fnclcc.fr

Accepted for publication October 18, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
P. Debourdeau, D. Kassab Chahmi, G. Le Gal, I. Kriegel, E. Desruennes, M.-C. Douard, I. Elalamy, G. Meyer, P. Mismetti, M. Pavic, et al.
2008 SOR guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer: report from the working group
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 1459 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 The OncologistHome page
J. J. Barron, M. J. Cziraky, T. Weisman, and D. G. Hicks
HER2 Testing and Subsequent Trastuzumab Treatment for Breast Cancer in a Managed Care Environment
Oncologist, August 1, 2009; 14(8): 760 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
G. Pentheroudakis, R. Stahel, H. Hansen, and N. Pavlidis
Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2008; 19(12): 2067 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
E. Nagy, J. Watine, P. S. Bunting, R. Onody, W. P. Oosterhuis, D. Rogic, S. Sandberg, K. Boda, and A. R. Horvath
Do Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus Fulfill the Criteria of Evidence-Based Guideline Development?
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1872 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
N. Pavlidis, H. Hansen, and R. Stahel
ESMO clinical recommendations: a practical guide for medical oncologists
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 1759 - 1763.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
F. Vigna-Taglianti, P. Vineis, A. Liberati, and F. Faggiano
Quality of systematic reviews used in guidelines for oncology practice
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 691 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
J. S. Burgers
Guideline Quality and Guideline Content: Are They Related?
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 3 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.