International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on September 29, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006 18(6):414-421; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl049
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towards patient-centered health services in India—a scale to measure patient perceptions of quality
1 Johns Hopkins University, Department of International Health, New Delhi, India, 2 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and 3 Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Objectives. (i) To develop a reliable and valid scale to measure in-patient and outpatient perceptions of quality in India and (ii) to identify aspects of perceived quality which have large effects on patient satisfaction.
Design. Cross-sectional survey of health facilities and patients at clinics.
Setting. Primary health centers, community health centers, district hospitals, and female district hospitals in the state of Uttar Pradesh in north India.
Main outcome measures. Internal consistency, validity, and factor structure of the scale are evaluated. The association between patient satisfaction and perceived quality dimensions is examined.
Results. A 16-item scale having good reliability and validity is developed. Five dimensions of perceived quality are identified—medicine availability, medical information, staff behavior, doctor behavior, and hospital infrastructure. Patient perceptions of quality at public health facilities are slightly better than neutral. Multivariate regression analysis results indicate that for outpatients, doctor behavior has the largest effect on general patient satisfaction followed by medicine availability, hospital infrastructure, staff behavior, and medical information. For in-patients, staff behavior has the largest effect followed by doctor behavior, medicine availability, medical information, and hospital infrastructure.
Conclusions. The scale developed can be used to measure perceived quality at a range of facility types for outpatients and in-patients. Perceived quality at public facilities is only marginally favorable, leaving much scope for improvement. Better staff and physician interpersonal skills, facility infrastructure, and availability of drugs have the largest effect in improving patient satisfaction at public health facilities.
Keywords: India, patient perceptions, patient satisfaction, quality of health care
Address reprint requests to Krishna Dipankar Rao, Johns Hopkins University, Department of International Health, E-13/6 Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-57, India. E-mail: krao{at}jhsph.edu
Accepted for publication September 4, 2006.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. S. Bazant and M. A. Koenig Women's satisfaction with delivery care in Nairobi's informal settlements Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2009; 21(2): 79 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Hansen, D. H. Peters, K. Viswanathan, K. D. Rao, A. Mashkoor, and G. Burnham Client perceptions of the quality of primary care services in Afghanistan Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2008; 20(6): 384 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. S. Andaleeb, N. Siddiqui, and S. Khandakar Patient satisfaction with health services in Bangladesh Health Policy Plan., July 1, 2007; 22(4): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|