Skip Navigation

International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006 18(Supplement 1):14-20; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McLoughlin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McLoughlin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care September 2006 © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Selecting indicators for patient safety at the health system level in OECD countries

Vivienne McLoughlin1, John Millar2, Soeren Mattke3, Margarida Franca4, Pia Maria Jonsson5, David Somekh6 and David Bates7

1 The Health Foundation, London, UK, 2 (Chair), Canadian Institute for Health Information, Toronto, Canada, 3 OECD Health Policy Unit, Paris, France, 4 Instituto da Qualidade em Saude, Lisbon, Portugal, 5 National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden, 6 European Society for Quality in Healthcare. London, UK, and 7 Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Background. Concerns about patient safety have arisen with growing documentation of the extent and nature of harm. Yet there are no robust and meaningful data that can be used internationally to assess the extent of the problem and considerable methodological difficulties.

Purpose. This article describes a project undertaken as part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Quality Indicator Project, which aimed at developing an initial set of patient safety indicators.

Methods. Patient safety indicators from OECD countries were identified and then rated against three principal criteria: importance to patient safety, scientific soundness, and potential feasibility. Although some countries are developing multi-source monitoring systems, these are not yet mature enough for international exchange. This project reviewed routine data collections as a starting point.

Results. Of an initial set of 59 candidate indicators identified, 21 were selected which cover known areas of harm to patients.

Conclusions. This project is an important initial step towards defining a usable set of patient safety indicators that will allow comparisons to be made internationally and will support mutual learning and quality improvement in health care. Measures of harm should be complemented over time with measures of effective improvement factors.

Keywords: patient safety, quality indicator

Address reprint requests to Dr Vin McLoughlin, Director of Programmes and Policy, The Health Foundation, 90 Long Acre, Covent Garden, London WC2E 9RA, UK. E-mail: vin.mcloughlin{at}health.org.uk

Accepted for publication July 14, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Bottle and P Aylin
Application of AHRQ patient safety indicators to English hospital data
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 303 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
S. E. Drosler, N. S. Klazinga, P. S. Romano, D. J. Tancredi, M. A. Gogorcena Aoiz, M. C. Hewitt, S. Scobie, M. Soop, E. Wen, H. Quan, et al.
Application of patient safety indicators internationally: a pilot study among seven countries
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2009; 21(4): 272 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.