Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on December 11, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007 19(1):37-44; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
19/1/37    most recent
mzl065v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agabiti, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agabiti, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care vol. 19 no. 1 © The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua). All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The influence of socioeconomic status on utilization and outcomes of elective total hip replacement: a multicity population-based longitudinal study

Nera Agabiti1, Sally Picciotto1, Giulia Cesaroni1, Luigi Bisanti2, Francesco Forastiere1, Roberta Onorati3, Barbara Pacelli4, Paolo Pandolfi4, Antonio Russo2, Teresa Spadea3, Carlo A. Perucci1 on behalf of the Italian Study Group on Inequalities in Health Care*

1 Epidemiology Department, Local Health Authority RM/E, Rome, 2 Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority, Milan, 3 Epidemiology Unit, Piedmont Region, Turin, and 4 Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority, Bologna

Objective. In countries with universal health coverage, socioeconomic status is not expected to influence access to effective treatment and its prognosis. We tested whether socioeconomic status affects the rates of elective total hip replacement and whether it plays a role in early and late outcomes.

Design. Multicity population-based longitudinal study.

Settings and participants. From Hospital Registries of four Italian cities (Rome, Milan, Turin, and Bologna), we identified 6140 residents aged 65+ years undergoing elective total hip replacement in 1997–2000.

Main outcome measures. An area-based (census block) income index was used for each individual. Poisson regression yielded rate ratios (RR) of population occurrence by income level. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (OR) of selected outcomes within 90 days. Cox proportional hazard models evaluated effects of income on rates of revision of total hip replacement and mortality up to 31 December 2004. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, city of residence, and coexisting medical conditions.

Results. Low-income people were less likely than high-income counterparts to undergo total hip replacement [RR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.95]; the effect was stronger among those aged 75+ years (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.86). Low income was associated with higher risk of acute adverse medical events (P trend = 0.05) and of general infections and decubitus ulcer (P trend = 0.02) within 90 days. The effects were even higher among those aged 75+ years. No effects were found either for orthopaedic complications within 90 days or for revision and mortality.

Conclusions. Total hip replacement is underutilized among elderly deprived individuals. Disadvantaged patients seem more vulnerable to acute adverse medical events after surgery. The evidence of unmet need and poor prognosis of low social class people has important implications for health care policy.

Keywords: access to health services, administrative data, adverse events, complications, inequalities in health, hip replacement

Address reprint requests to Nera Agabiti, Epidemiology Department, Local Health Authority RM/E, Via di S.Costanza 53, 00198 Rome, Italy. E-mail: agabiti{at}asplazio.it

Accepted for publication November 15, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
A. P. Barone, D. Fusco, P. Colais, M. D'Ovidio, V. Belleudi, N. Agabiti, C. Sorge, M. Davoli, and C. A. Perucci
Effects of socioeconomic position on 30-day mortality and wait for surgery after hip fracture
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2009; 21(6): 379 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
A. Judge, N. J. Welton, J. Sandhu, and Y. Ben-Shlomo
Geographical variation in the provision of elective primary hip and knee replacement: the role of socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables
J. Public Health Med., September 1, 2009; 31(3): 413 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
N Agabiti, G Cesaroni, S Picciotto, L Bisanti, N Caranci, G Costa, F Forastiere, C Marinacci, P Pandolfi, A Russo, et al.
The association of socioeconomic disadvantage with postoperative complications after major elective cardiovascular surgery
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2008; 62(10): 882 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.