Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2007
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007 19(2):57-59; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/57    most recent
mzm004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walshe, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Understanding what works—and why—in quality improvement: the need for theory-driven evaluation

Kieran Walshe

Centre for Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK

Address reprint request to Kieran Walshe, Manchester centre for Healthcare Management, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Tel: (0161) 275 3852. Fax: (0161) 273 5245. E-mail: kieran.walshe@man.ac.uk


The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Clinicians who are asked to participate in quality improvement programmes in healthcare organizations are often heard to ask for the evidence that they ‘work’. By that, they often mean they want randomized controlled trials, which show that accreditation, or credentialing, or criterion-based audit, or adverse event monitoring, or continuous quality improvement programmes, or whatever approach is being used cause meaningful and worthwhile improvements in the quality of care [1]. When they learn that there are relatively few experimental studies of quality improvement interventions [2], and those which do exist often show weak or moderate effects at best, this state of affairs is sometimes used to argue that it is not worthwhile . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. D. Ralston, D. P. Martin, M. L. Anderson, P. A. Fishman, D. A. Conrad, E. B. Larson, and D. Grembowski
Group Health Cooperative's Transformation Toward Patient-Centered Access
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2009; 66(6): 703 - 724.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
A. K Rowe, F. Onikpo, M. Lama, and M. S Deming
The rise and fall of supervision in a project designed to strengthen supervision of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness in Benin
Health Policy Plan., November 18, 2009; (2009) czp054v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
B. Andersson-Gare
Improvement education by improving education: a model for integration of teaching, learning and research while practice is improved
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 246 - 247.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
G. Filardo, D. Nicewander, J. Herrin, J. Edwards, P. Galimbertti, M. Tietze, S. Mcbride, J. Gunderson, A. Collinsworth, Z. Haydar, et al.
A hospital-randomized controlled trial of a formal quality improvement educational program in rural and small community Texas hospitals: one year results
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2009; 21(4): 225 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
A. K. Rowe
Potential of Integrated Continuous Surveys and Quality Management to Support Monitoring, Evaluation, and the Scale-Up of Health Interventions in Developing Countries
Am J Trop Med Hyg, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 971 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
K. Walshe
Pseudoinnovation: the development and spread of healthcare quality improvement methodologies
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2009; 21(3): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. Waring
Getting to the 'roots' of patient safety
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 19(5): 257 - 258.
[Full Text] [PDF]