Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on June 14, 2007
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007 19(4):183-186; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/4/183    most recent
mzm024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamblin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamblin, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Editorial

Publishing ‘quality’ measures: how it works and when it does not?

E-mail: hamblinsusa@yahoo.com

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Although efforts to measure the quality of healthcare are longstanding, over the past 10 years, there have been increasing efforts to both measure the quality of healthcare and publish the resulting data in many industrialized countries. This may simply be the part of a broad trend in western societies towards greater openness and accountability that seems particularly evident in the realm of human services such as health and education. However, publication is also expected to encourage improvements in the quality of care.

Improved quality is expected to happen in one of two ways. Having performance information easily available may encourage greater consumerism among patients so that they seek out the best providers, a premise which underlies the stated policy of both US and UK governments. As yet the evidence for this happening is generally scanty and equivocal [1, 2]. In . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Richard Hamblin

2006/07 Harkness Fellow,
Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?