Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2008
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008 20(5):363-371; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/5/363    most recent
mzn023v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Jardali, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tchaghchaghian, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Jardali, F.
Right arrow Articles by Tchaghchaghian, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

The impact of hospital accreditation on quality of care: perception of Lebanese nurses

Fadi El-Jardali1, Diana Jamal1, Hani Dimassi2, Walid Ammar3 and Victoria Tchaghchaghian1

1 Health Management and Policy Department, American University of Beirut
2 School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University
3 Ministry of Public Health in Lebanon

Background. In developing countries, accreditation is increasingly being used as a tool for government regulation to guarantee quality of care. Although Lebanon is the first country in the East Mediterranean Region to develop and implement accreditation standards, little is known yet on its impact on quality of care.

Objective. To assess the perceived impact of accreditation on quality of care through the lens of health care professionals, specifically nurses. This paper also investigates the perceived contributing factors that can explain change in quality of care.

Methods. A cross-sectional survey design where all hospitals that successfully passed both national accreditation surveys (I and II) were included. A total of 1048 registered nurses from 59 hospitals were sampled. The survey tool, assessing quality of care and contributing factors, includes nine scales and subscales rated on five-point Likert scale.

Results. The high score for the variable ‘Quality Results’ indicates that nurses perceived an improvement in quality during and after the accreditation process. Predictors of better Quality Results were Leadership, Commitment and Support, Use of Data, Quality Management, Staff Involvement and hospital size. The variable Quality Management, as measured by the scale Quality Management, had the greatest impact in medium-sized hospitals while the subscale measuring Staff Involvement had the greatest impact in small-sized hospitals.

Conclusion. According to Lebanese nurses, hospital accreditation is a good tool for improving quality of care. In order to ensure that accreditation brings effective quality improvement practices, there is a need to assess quality based on patient outcome indicators.

Keywords: quality improvement, accreditation, hospitals, quality of care, nursing

Address reprint requests to: Fadi El-Jardali, Health Management and Policy Department, American University of Beirut, Lebanon. E-mail: fe08{at}edu.lb

Accepted for publication June 2, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
M. Bateganya, A. Hagopian, P. Tavrow, S. Luboga, and S. Barnhart
Incentives and barriers to implementing national hospital standards in Uganda
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2009; 21(6): 421 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.