Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access originally published online on July 24, 2008
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2008 20(6):433-438; doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzn031
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/433    most recent
mzn031v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjøs, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Romøren, T. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjøs, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Romøren, T. I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Quality improvement in a publicly provided long-term care system: the case of Norway

Bente Ødegård Kjøs1, Grete Botten2 and Tor Inge Romøren1

1 Center for Care Research, Gjøvik University College, P.O. Box 191, N-2802 Gjøvik, Norway
2 Institute of Health Management and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Objective. To explore the extent to which quality improvement activities are implemented in the Norwegian long-term care system for older people, and to determine if variations in the extent and scope of quality improvement activities are associated with the characteristics of the first-line care leaders, the sector or the size of the municipality.

Design. A cross-sectional telephone survey supplemented with information from public records and official municipal websites. Data were organized according to six total quality management components, and a sum score was developed to measure quality improvement. Variations in the extent of quality improvement activities were analysed using multivariate analysis.

Setting. Thirty-two Norwegian municipalities stratified according to region and population size.

Participants. Sixty-four first-line leaders in nursing homes and home-based care.

Main outcome measure. A sum score has been used as a measure of quality improvement activities.

Results. The unit's quality improvement activities varied by quality improvement components and by municipality. The technical component that requires training in tools and techniques was low; the general components as ‘leader's involvement’ and ‘employee participation’ were more common. The size of the populations of the municipalities showed a significant independent association with the scope of quality activities.

Conclusions. The six quality improvement components varied from high to extremely low, and the large municipalities had more quality activities than small- or medium-sized municipalities.

Keywords: long-term care, public sector, quality improvement, leadership

Address reprint requests to: Bente Ødegård Kjøs, Center for Care Research, Gjøvik University College, PO Box 191, N-2802 Gjøvik, Norway. Tel: +47 61 13 53 91; Fax: +47 61 13 51 70; E-mail: bente{at}kjoes.com

Accepted for publication June 30, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.