International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access first published online on January 21, 2005
This version published online on February 21, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi016
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), Radbound University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Objective. To investigate effectiveness, definitions, and components of integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients on the basis of systematic reviews. Design. Literature review from January 1996 to May 2004. Main measures. Definitions and components of integrated care programmes and all effects reported on the quality of care. Results. Searches in the Medline and Cochrane databases identified 13 systematic reviews of integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients. Despite considerable heterogeneity in interventions, patient populations, and processes and outcomes of care, integrated care programmes seemed to have positive effects on the quality of patient care. No consistent definitions were present for the management of patients with chronic illnesses. In all the reviews the aims of integrated care programmes were very similar, namely reducing fragmentation and improving continuity and coordination of care, but the focus and content of the programmes differed widely. The most common components of integrated care programmes were selfmanagement support and patient education, often combined with structured clinical follow-up and case management; a multidisciplinary patient care team; multidisciplinary clinical pathways and feedback, reminders, and education for professionals. Conclusion. Integrated care programmes seemed to have positive effects on the quality of care. However, integrated care programmes have widely varying definitions and components and failure to recognize these variations leads to inappropriate conclusions about the effectiveness of these programmes and to inappropriate application of research results. To compare programmes and better understand the (cost) effectiveness of the programmes, consistent definitions must be used and component interventions must be well described.
Accepted December 1, 2004
Article
Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: a review of systematic reviews
Marielle Ouwens, E-mail: M.Ouwens{at}wok.umcn.nl
Abstract
The originally published version of this paper was incorrect. In Table 1 on page 3, the note for trend shows decrease was incorrectly labelled as + = trend shows decrease when it should have been labelled as - = trend shows decrease.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. J. Hunter Focusing osteoarthritis management on modifiable risk factors and future therapeutic prospects Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Diseases, October 1, 2009; 1(1): 35 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Stange and R. L. Ferrer The Paradox of Primary Care Ann. Fam. Med, July 1, 2009; 7(4): 293 - 299. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Ouwens, M. Hulscher, R. Hermens, M. Faber, H. Marres, H. Wollersheim, and R. Grol Implementation of integrated care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of interventions and effects Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2009; 21(2): 137 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bourbeau and J. van der Palen Promoting effective self-management programmes to improve COPD Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2009; 33(3): 461 - 463. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Minkman, K. Ahaus, I. Fabbricotti, U. Nabitz, and R. Huijsman A quality management model for integrated care: results of a Delphi and Concept Mapping study Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 21(1): 66 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Coleman, B. T. Austin, C. Brach, and E. H. Wagner Evidence On The Chronic Care Model In The New Millennium Health Aff., January 1, 2009; 28(1): 75 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Balabanova, M. McKee, N. Koroleva, I. Chikovani, K. Goguadze, T. Kobaladze, O. Adeyi, and S. Robles Navigating the health system: diabetes care in Georgia Health Policy Plan., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 46 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K M M Lemmens, A P Nieboer, C P van Schayck, J D Asin, and R Huijsman A model to evaluate quality and effectiveness of disease management Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2008; 17(6): 447 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Sidorov The Patient-Centered Medical Home For Chronic Illness: Is It Ready For Prime Time? Health Aff., September 1, 2008; 27(5): 1231 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Ouwens, M Hulscher, R Akkermans, R Hermens, R Grol, and H Wollersheim The Team Climate Inventory: application in hospital teams and methodological considerations Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Russell, P. Thille, W. Hogg, and J. Lemelin Beyond Fighting Fires and Chasing Tails? Chronic Illness Care Plans in Ontario, Canada Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2008; 6(2): 146 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Minkman, K. Ahaus, and R. Huijsman Performance improvement based on integrated quality management models: what evidence do we have? A systematic literature review Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2007; 19(2): 90 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. Gulliford, S. Naithani, and M. Morgan Measuring Continuity of Care in Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience-Based Measure Ann. Fam. Med, November 1, 2006; 4(6): 548 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|