Skip Navigation



International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on March 2, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi028
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/217    most recent
mzi028v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilhelmsson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lindberg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilhelmsson, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care © International Society for Quality in Health Care and Oxford University Press 2005; all rights reserved
Accepted January 5, 2005

Article

The use of clinical guidelines for asthma, diabetes, and hypertension in primary health care

Malou Lindberg 1*, Mildrid Lind 1, Susanne Petersson 1, and Susan Wilhelmsson 1

1 R&D Department of Local Health Care, County of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Malou Lindberg, E-mail: malou.lindberg{at}lio.se


  Abstract

Objective. To investigate which clinical guidelines primary health care staff refer to regarding asthma, diabetes, and hypertension, the number of existing guidelines, and the organizational level at which they were drawn up, and whether there are different guidelines for the same disease, either in different primary health care centres or within individual centres.

Design. The study is descriptive. Data were obtained by telephone interviews and by procuring clinical guidelines regarding asthma, diabetes, and hypertension from primary health care centres.

Setting. Forty-one primary health care centres in one county in southeastern Sweden.

Study participants. General practitioners and registered nurses in primary health care.

Results. The telephone interviews showed that the staff referred to several guidelines covering each of the three diseases and these guidelines had been drawn up at five different organizational levels. The length of the clinical guidelines varied from 1 to 257 pages, and the number of guidelines for each disease ranged between 1 and 5.

Conclusion. It was found that there were several documents covering the same disease that primary care staff referred to as ‘guidelines’, and that the length of the guidelines varied and they had been drawn up at different levels. A finding with possible serious consequences was that an old version of an asthma guideline was used in all primary health care centres in the study.

Keywords: asthma, clinical guidelines, diabetes, hypertension, primary health care.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
A.-B. E. Wirehn, H. M. Karlsson, and J. M. Carstensen
Estimating disease prevalence using a population-based administrative healthcare database
Scand J Public Health, August 1, 2007; 35(4): 424 - 431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.