International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on May 5, 2005
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi033
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Delivery, Organization and Markets, Rockville, MD, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Introduction. The logic of paying more for high-quality care and less for low-quality resonates. Increasingly health system leaders worldwide acknowledge that payment reforms are needed to do just that, prompted no doubt by the growing body of evidence indicating that quality is not what it should be. Purpose. This review was undertaken to explore contexts in which quality-based payment appears feasible. The ultimate intent is to provoke thoughtful debate about whether and how quality-based payment might fit within a particular developing country’s framework of policies to ensure and promote quality of care. Methods. With guidance from key informants with first-hand knowledge of international quality-based payment schemes, a purposive sample of six quality-based payment schemes was assembled. Schemes were examined to identify environmental contexts and design features. Results. Examples illustrate a variety of approaches and a breadth of contexts in which quality-based payment has been implemented. Contrary to what might be expected, implementation does not appear to be constrained to private-sector purchasers, private-sector providers, hospital settings, nor to any particular type of underlying payment system. Further, quality-based payment pioneers are using a variety of incentive structures, and are tapping a rich mix of structural, process, and outcome standards to benchmark quality. Conclusion. Despite significant operational challenges, quality-based payment has been implemented in developing as well as developed countries, albeit not frequently in either instance. What we do not know--what the literature is nearly silent on--relates to the sustainability and ultimate impact of alternative incentive schemes.
Accepted February 4, 2005
Perspectives on Quality
Quality-based payment: six case examples
Peggy McNamara, E-mail: pmcnamar{at}ahrq.gov
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Eldridge and N. Palmer Performance-based payment: some reflections on the discourse, evidence and unanswered questions Health Policy Plan., May 1, 2009; 24(3): 160 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Duckett, S. Daniels, M. Kamp, A. Stockwell, G. Walker, and M. Ward Pay for performance in Australia: Queensland's new Clinical Practice Improvement Payment J Health Serv Res Policy, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 174 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. D. Pearson, E. C. Schneider, K. P. Kleinman, K. L. Coltin, and J. A. Singer The Impact Of Pay-For-Performance On Health Care Quality In Massachusetts, 2001-2003 Health Aff., July 1, 2008; 27(4): 1167 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Katz-Navon, E. Naveh, and Z. Stern The moderate success of quality of care improvement efforts: three observations on the situation Int. J. Qual. Health Care, February 1, 2007; 19(1): 4 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P McNamara Purchaser strategies to influence quality of care: from rhetoric to global applications. Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2006; 15(3): 171 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Mcnamara Provider-specific report cards: a tool for health sector accountability in developing countries Health Policy Plan., March 1, 2006; 21(2): 101 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. McNamara Foreword: Payment Matters? The Next Chapter Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2006; 63(1_suppl): 5S - 10S. [PDF]
|
|