Skip Navigation



International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on June 10, 2005

International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi056
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/5/439    most recent
mzi056v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castle, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castle, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved
Accepted April 30, 2005

Article

Are family members suitable proxies for transitional care unit residents when collecting satisfaction information?

Nicholas Castle 1*

1 Health Policy & Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nicholas Castle, E-mail: castlen{at}pitt.edu


   Abstract

Objective. To examine the agreement and association of elders’ responses with family member proxy responses using the same, previously validated satisfaction instrument on both groups of respondents.

Methods. Satisfaction data came from transitional care unit residents and family members (N = 462 paired responses) from one facility and were collected between 1999 and 2000. The satisfaction questionnaire consisted of 17 items evaluating the art of care, technical quality, efficacy, amenities of the care environment, and global satisfaction. Bias indexes and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to examine the satisfaction scores.

Results. In general, proxy satisfaction ratings were higher than ratings of residents. The results also show that proxy ratings varied less from resident ratings for the amenity items, which were considered the most concrete items. Proxy ratings were much higher for the art of care and efficacy domain items, which were considered the least concrete items.

Conclusion. The results of this investigation show that proxy ratings do not necessarily substitute for resident ratings.

Keywords: family, proxies, transitional care unit.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.