Skip Navigation



International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on October 7, 2005

International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi081
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/102    most recent
mzi081v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohammed, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hussain, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal for Quality in Health Care © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved
Accepted September 10, 2005

Article

Process of care and mortality of stroke patients with and without a do not resuscitate order in the West Midlands, UK

Mohammed A. Mohammed 1*, Jonathan Mant 2, Louise Bentham 1, Andrew Stevens 1, and Shakir Hussain 2

1 Public Health & Epidemiology, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK
2 General Practice & Primary Care, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mohammed A. Mohammed, E-mail: m.a.mohammed{at}bham.ac.uk


   Abstract

Objectives. To compare the process of care of stroke patients with and without a do not resuscitate (DNR) order.

Design. Retrospective case note review with prospective follow up of mortality.

Setting. Seven acute hospitals, with stroke units, in the West Midlands, UK.

Participants. A random sample of patients (n = 702) admitted to hospital with acute stroke over a twelve month period.

Main outcome measures. Case mix and process of care measures derived from the intercollegiate stroke audit package. Thirty day and one year mortality.

Results. About one-third (34%, 238/702) of stroke patients had DNR orders. The thirty-day mortality for DNR patients was 67% (160/238) versus 10% (46/449) for patients without DNR orders. DNR patients had significantly worse case-mix profile than non-DNR patients - median age 81 y vs 75y; fully conscious 36% vs 79%, able to walk 1% vs 21% and no loss of power in either arm 5% vs 24% (all p < 0.0001).

DNR patients were more likely to be assessed early by a speech and language therapist (77% vs 59%, p < 0.001), but less likely to receive the majority of their care in a stroke/rehabilitation unit (20% vs 57%, p < 0.0001), or be cared for on a stroke unit or by a stroke team (42% vs 70%, p <0.0001), or had a description of the site of the cerebral lesion (31% vs 38%, p = 0.05) or be given aspirin (30% vs 42%, p = 0.007).

Conclusions. Stroke patients with a DNR order are not receiving optimum care in that they are not being cared for on stroke units or by specialist teams. This may reflect the inadequate provision of specialist stroke services in the UK.

Keywords: stroke, do not resuscitate, DNR, mortality, process of care, quality of care, outcome.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.