Skip Navigation



International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on October 27, 2005

International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzi086
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/1/66    most recent
mzi086v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khan, M. M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khan, M. M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mori, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved
Accepted September 24, 2005

Article

Post-training quality of syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections by chemists and druggists in Pokhara, Nepal: is it satisfactory?

M. M. H. Khan 1*, S. Wolter 2, and Mitsuru Mori 3

1 Department of Public Health, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Department of Statistics, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
3 Department of Public Health, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. M. H. Khan, E-mail: khan{at}sapmed.ac.jp


   Abstract

Objective. Using simulated client and provider interview methods, this study assessed chemists and druggists’ post-training management quality of syndromic sexually transmitted infections focusing on the areas of privacy maintaining, encouraging, history taking, counseling, referral practice, partner notification, and drug prescribing and then compared the findings of two methods.

Design. Forty-five pharmacies from a list of 75 in Pokhara, who collected sexually transmitted infections data during 1999, were selected randomly. First simulated client successfully presented either urethral or vaginal discharge syndrome at 37 pharmacies and recorded the events of whole encounter into an observation form within 20 minutes. Later 39 chemists and druggists were interviewed by a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire.

Main measures. Results were reported mainly by numbers and corresponding percentages. For comparative purpose, P values were also shown.

Results. Overall, interview method revealed satisfactory knowledge of chemists and druggists for management of sexually transmitted infections except drug prescribing but their actual behaviors, revealed by simulated client method, indicated lower quality and differed significantly in the areas of encouraging, history taking, counseling, referral practice, and partner notification. Both methods indicated very poor qualities of drug prescribing.

Conclusion. Retained knowledge of chemists and druggists for syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections were not applied to simulated client in actual practice. They should not prescribe drugs for patients of sexually transmitted infections, except referring to the doctors/hospitals. Continuous monitoring and further motivations for them may improve syndromic management quality of sexually transmitted infections. Moreover, depending on the purpose of study, various methods should be applied simultaneously to reach a better conclusion.

Keywords: interview method, private drug sellers, sexually transmitted infections, simulated client method, syndromic management.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.