Skip Navigation


International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access first published online on March 23, 2006
This version published online on April 5, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl003
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/3/211    most recent
mzl003v2
mzl003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van den Heede, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vleugels, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van den Heede, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vleugels, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved
Accepted February 15, 2006

Article

Adverse outcomes in Belgian acute hospitals: retrospective analysis of the national hospital discharge dataset

Koen Van den Heede 1, Walter Sermeus 1, Luwis Diya 2, Emmanuel Lesaffre 2, and Arthur Vleugels 1 *

1 Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2 Biostatistical Center, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Arthur Vleugels, E-mail: Arthur.vleugels{at}med.kuleuven.be


  Abstract

Objective. The prevalence and variability of adverse outcome rates in Belgian acute hospitals is examined by using the national hospital discharge database.

Design, setting, and participants. Retrospective analysis based on administrative data of all Belgian acute hospitals, covering the full medical (n = 1 024 743) and surgical (n = 633 027) in-patients population for the year 2000.

Main outcome measures. For 11 adverse outcomes and failure-to-rescue, the rates and variability among hospitals were studied. The all patient refined diagnostic-related groups (APR-DRG) method was used for risk adjustment.

Results. The prevalence of adverse outcomes was 7.12% in the medical and 6.32% in the surgical group. Rates ranged from 6.25 (deep venous thrombosis) to 32.3 (urinary tract infection) outcomes per 1000 discharges in the medical group and from 3.39 (deep venous thrombosis) to 17.6 (urinary tract infection) outcomes per 1000 discharges in the surgical group. The failure-to-rescue rate was 240 and 211 per 1000 discharges, respectively. Except for pressure ulcers and hospital-acquired sepsis, the prevalence of adverse outcomes was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in the medical group. All adverse outcome rates varied substantially among the hospitals surveyed.

Conclusions. This study identifies the occurrence of adverse outcomes in a national population. It adds information to the growing body of knowledge in predominantly Anglo-Saxon countries about adverse outcomes. Striking variation exists in the risk-adjusted adverse outcome rates across Belgian acute hospitals, revealing a large potential for quality gains that encourage further action.

Keywords: administrative data, patient safety, quality measurement, risk adjustment.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
T J B Kline, C Willness, and W A Ghali
Predicting patient complaints in hospital settings
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2008; 17(5): 346 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, July 22, 2006; 333(7560): 208 - 208.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.