International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on September 2, 2006
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl034
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Bath Spa University, Sociology, Bath, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Clinical utility is an increasingly used concept in health care, but one that lacks an agreed formal definition or conceptualization. In this article, I show that the term is commonly used as a synonym for studies of clinical effectiveness and/or economic evaluations and argue that further factors relating to everyday working practice should be included under its auspices. I go on to develop a multi-dimensional model that outlines four factors in practitioners judgements about clinical utility: appropriateness, accessibility, practicability, and acceptability.
Accepted July 21, 2006
Article
A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility
Andrew Smart 1 *
Andrew Smart, E-mail: a.smart{at}bathspa.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. P. Browman, T. Berrang, and S. Smith Prognostic Tools for Cancer Survival: A Secondary Role for Quality-of-Life Measurement J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2009; 27(18): 2902 - 2904. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Dalsgaard, H. Kallerup, and M. Rosendal Outreach visits to improve dementia care in general practice: a qualitative study Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2007; 19(5): 267 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

