Skip Navigation



International Journal for Quality in Health Care Advance Access published online on February 2, 2007

International Journal for Quality in Health Care, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzl069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/60    most recent
mzl069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Divi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Divi, C.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved

Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study

Chandrika Divi, Richard G. Koss, Stephen P. Schmaltz and Jerod M. Loeb

The Joint Commission, One Renaissance Boulevard, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181, USA

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in the characteristics of adverse events between English speaking patients and patients with limited English proficiency in US hospitals.

SETTING: Six Joint Commission accredited hospitals in the USA.

METHOD: Adverse event data on English speaking patients and patients with limited English proficiency were collected from six hospitals over 7 months in 2005 and classified using the National Quality Forum endorsed Patient Safety Event Taxonomy.

RESULTS: About 49.1% of limited English proficient patient adverse events involved some physical harm whereas only 29.5% of adverse events for patients who speak English resulted in physical harm. Of those adverse events resulting in physical harm, 46.8% of the limited English proficient patient adverse events had a level of harm ranging from moderate temporary harm to death, compared with 24.4% of English speaking patient adverse events. The adverse events that occurred to limited English proficient patients were also more likely to be the result of communication errors (52.4%) than adverse events for English speaking patients (35.9%).

CONCLUSIONS: Language barriers appear to increase the risks to patient safety. It is important for patients with language barriers to have ready access to competent language services. Providers need to collect reliable language data at the patient point of entry and document the language services provided during the patient–provider encounter.

Keywords: patient safety, adverse events, language barriers, language proficiency, patient safety event taxonomy

Address reprint request to Richard G. Koss, The Joint Commission. Tel: +1-630-792-5939; Fax: +1-630-792-4939; E-mail: rkoss{at}jointcommission.org

Accepted for publication December 1, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
Y. Schenker, B. Lo, K. M. Ettinger, and A. Fernandez
Navigating Language Barriers under Difficult Circumstances
Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2008; 149(4): 264 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
T. Perneger
Quality of Care as a Field of Research: What We Published, 2004-2007
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 20(3): 153 - 154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
R. Barn
'Race', Ethnicity and Child Welfare: A Fine Balancing Act
Br. J. Soc. Work, December 1, 2007; 37(8): 1425 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.